8:00 - 9:00
Opening Hour Mon - Fri
Legal firm was establised by a team of solicitors referenced from International Legal Review Board. It's was esrablished on August 1991, to oversee the elaboration, registration and certification of legal cases with the North Americas and Europe. The objective of establishing the legal firm is to alleviate and reduce the tensions on Matrimonial cases, domestic, reported cases on property management and civil law. We operates with other relevant practitioners, legalized correspondents and corporate offices. As a legal firm, we work in teams with effective legal resources and instruments. Our records in legal affairs and cases' settlement with registered and prospective clients are impeccable.
Learn More
On 17 June 2020, Zurich Insurance Company Ltd & Zurich South America Invest AB commenced arbitration proceedings against the Plurinational State of Bolivia pursuant to Article 9 of the Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of Bolivia on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments.
summit to address the coordination of economic activities and policies among EU member states. German resistance to such a global deal was strong, and pessimism about a unified EU banking system ran high as a result of the EU financial crisis. The conflict reflects the difficulty of forging multiparty agreements during times of stress and crisis.
Doe Company v. Doe STRATUM LEGAL Verdict: $45.6 million Legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty case involving concealment of conflict of interest in real estate transaction. Confidential settlement reached before punitive damage phase.
Doe Company v. Doe Bank Settlement $3.7 million A breach of contract action involving a loan origination company and a bank.
Cedars Sinai Medical Center v Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp: Confidential Settlement Legal Malpractice Action regarding the failure to timely file a patent application relating to an improvement to laser eye surgical procedures.
Lepire v. AON Corporation Pending The plaintiff developed a unique insurance product called SafeLease and gave Swett & Crawford exclusivity to broker the product. In turn, they hired him as a consultant to generate business and agreed that he would retain the intellectual property ownership rights to SafeLease. Swett and Crawford's parent, Aon Corporation, then hired the plaintiff, learned all about the plaintiff's product, including his marketing strategy, then fired the plaintiff. Aon and its business partners are now selling the same product under a different name.
Business Consultant
Criminal Consultant
Divorce Consultant
Immigration Consultant